🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are considering similar bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that phones and platforms are "robbing our kids' childhood". The policy may be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to approve a proposal lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is provided. While it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a solid first step," said the parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "supported by robust evidence".

Last year, interest built behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing disturbing platform posts argues that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for young users," said a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, action is mostly happening at the state government level amid national inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law capping under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from certain politicians to follow this path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, other countries are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies strike a more cautious tone. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The agency notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

Even as this global discussion evolves, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that states around the world are increasingly content to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.